Bruno Fagali Keeps The World Updated With News From FagaPress

In a recent report revealed by Bruno Fagali through FagaPress which is the blog site that updates activities on the corporate front and the business world, and supported Bruno Fagali, Transparency International shows the difference between perceptions and the actual index by the organization relating to accountability. According to FagaPress, it is important to understand the interpretation of the Transparency International Index because only then will the issues of concern come to the fore.

Bruno Fagali is a renowned lawyer in Brazil. He graduated in University of Sao Paolo, specializing in administrative law. Now, he’s working as corporate integrity manager at Nova/SB.

The Meaning of the Index

According to the information revealed by the blog owned by Bruno Fagali, it looks as if little is said about the criteria used in arriving at the Transparency Index. FagaPress observes that elaborating the index is an important function to help in expressing the meaning of the index clearly. The revelation details that the ranking does not precisely reflect the level of corruption in a country. The report says that the use of the term corruption is becoming bloated and relative. It says that the Transparency Index actually measures perception. Consequently, the index is largely a matter of subjectivity. Thus, it does not reflect concrete data in the various institutions of a country.

Follow Bruno Fagali on LinkedIn

Some Curiosities Pointed Out By Bruno Fagali Press

In real fact, Transparency does not primarily go out to look for subjective feelings of people regarding such an important aspect of development as corruption. The report by Transparency International is derived from data that is gathered for a period of over 2 years according to fagali.com. It uses a minimum of three reputable institutions to collate its data. It incorporates public perceptions of corruption in services offered by the government and other key institutions. In effect, it means that the various institutions that supply Transparency International with information conduct the interviews and derive the values which are compared by Transparency International to generate a number. There are two critical characteristics that need to be pointed out. One of the important strategies is that no one institution is used to conduct the research. Some of the major institutions commonly used at global level include the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and the World Economic Forum. These institutions conduct research in different countries. The scope that the institutions cover varies between them. For instance, the African Development Banks scope is limited to Africa. Bruno Fagali continues to update communities on ethics compliance across the globe.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.